The following is intended purely just to show the public that this Data Protection is a Joke.

For a start anyone chaged in Scotland is provided with a list of witnesses names and address’s so you would think this would do away with data protection right away.

To add insult to injury though, I already have “Crown Witneses Precognitions” as Crown put it but further insult comes from the fact that once a witness gives evidence in court then their “Data” becomes public Knowledge. Thus not covered by Data Protection.

We only need look at recent Appeals on the High Court Website to find cases were peoples details are published daily with evidence also of what witnesses said what and how.

Further insult in my case comes from the fact that not only do i have Crown Precognitions i also have the “Minutes” of my trial Provided by SCCRC, Which among other things contains the Jurors Names and Address’s.

All documents mentioned above can be viewed bellow:

I will continue to post copies of all Crown Precognitions including the two Postmen who where Robbed in Livingston on 12 Dec 1981 at Carmondean Shopping Centre (Safeway Superstore) until i have published all witness’s names and address’s, Then i will ask my MSP to do another FOI request asking for them again now that their names and Address’s are revealed to the public.

Watch out also not only for their names and Address’s from 1981 but also for their current address’s found via the voters roll, Like Nigel Muckle Policeman no longer from Livingston but now residing in Mid Calder.

Full names and address’s will be revealed.

Charge sheet and list of Crown Witness’s are listed in the following two documents:

Despite this Crown have continually refused to hand over basically what i already have.
Their letter of refusal from 2005 can now be viewed below with their pathetic excuse for non disclosure

Note this letter is signed by head of High Court Unit.

Watch out next for postmen’s Crown Precognitions with their address’s and other people’s Data handed to me by SCCRC.

SCCRC Incompetence and Data Protection sham.

SCCRC lost important documents which i have kept regarding my case, including letters i sent to George Younger the then Secretary of State for Scotland (Now Dead) and Justice at Chancery Lane London.
For proof of their incompetence and negligence they handed me other peoples documents and in particular as mentioned above Jurors names and address’s but below clearly they handed me documents concerning an appeal to them by John King against his sentence. See below for proof:

See Postmen’s Address’s that were robbed in my case Below:

Postman William John Young Horn, 86 Stewartfield Crescent, Broxburn, West Lothian.

Postman John Ramsay Smart Henderson, 32 Charles Crescent, Bathgate, West Lothian.

Quite clearly these statements are either Police or Crown Witness statements, They certainly bear the Crown Stamp.
Despite these being released to me Crown Office are and have for many years told me they cannot release these to me as they contain Data which identifies living people.
The above two postmen are listed as ages 44 and 46 in 1982 which would make them 70 and 72, Crown should state if they have evidence these witness’s are still living since they have sought to use data protection as a ban on releasing these documents.

The fact that i have these documents and crown refuse to release them speaks volumes.

My MSP has done a FOI request asking for these documents and been told they were released at the time of trial.
This certainly adds credence to my complaint that my defence team had them at the time of my trial which they have sought to convince SCCRC they never saw.

Mr Taylor QC says if he had seen the crown witness’s statements he would seriously have considered calling David Livingston, The fact he never called this crucial crown witness means he defectively represented me.
SCCRC never asked Crown office if they were released to my defence team but since crown have now confirmed they were, speaks volumes about the SCCRCs reluctance to investigate their own as they should have asked when they were released.

By Clicking on the photo it will allow you to view larger version.
After clicking it will take you to flickr.
Once there above the photo click All Sizes.
Hey presto, Enlarged photo.

Answer from Justice minister but note it was passed to the sole sponsers of SCCRC Justice Department What a Joke:

I just had to reply to this Blase Reply and this can be seen here:

Be sure to watch out for further letters to Justice Minister concerning SCCRC and also The Standards Commissioner for Scotland with their replies.
Their replies certainly show a culture of cover up and lack of investigation into the conduct of SCCRC and allows them (SCCRC) to do what they want, when they want, and all sanctioned by the Justice Minister and Justice Department.

Chief Executive of SCCRC can be seen here:

Response to latest reply informing me wrongly that i could complain to The Standards Commissioner who in turn wrote back saying they could not investuigate my type of complaints.
Basically bar taking Judicial review against SCCRC there is no one to whom you can complain.
When i did complain to SCCRC the person whom i was complaining of answered my complaints Gerard Sinclair “Flasher” seen above deals with all complaints even ones directed against him.

The reply listed below was sent despite them knowing i had no access to the internet ?

For the avoidance of doubt J Clark Pearson sits on the board of the user group set up by SCCRC to discuss policies etc, see here:

Stakeholders’Views
The Commission has also set up a User Group Forum
whose members comprise:
The Commission’s Chief Executive, Director of
Administration and Senior Legal Officer;
Tom Higgins, Appeals Manager Justiciary Office;
Lindsay Anderson, Crown Office Policy Group;
Chief Superintendent Janette Joyce, Strathclyde Police;
Stuart Sproul, Prison Officer, HMP Shotts;
Graham Walker, Criminal Defence Solicitor;
William McVicar, Criminal Defence Solicitor; and
Clark Pearson, Scottish Executive Justice Department.

Thie above can be found on page 19 of the annual report of SCCRC for 2004-2005 Here:

http://www.sccrc.org.uk/viewfile.aspx?id=97

Quite clearly he should not be dealing in any way with complaints against someone he knows.
This shows our Last Government allowed conflicts of interest like this to flourish and did absolutely Hee Haw to protect the public interests in conflicts like this.
Indeed it was the First and Justice Ministers that passed my complaints to Pearson.

Be sure to look again in a few days time when the Standards Commissioner’s letters will be published.
The standards commissioner whom Justice Minister said i could complain!!!!

Letters from Standards commissioner:

Confidential to myself, No chance when they choose to cover matters up and refuse to fully explore my complaints.
If Taylor resigns in Lockerbie then he should have done the same 2 years previous when my own case and complaints against him were accepted for review by SCCRC

Quite clearly another whitewash.

Why was i told to complain to someone who could not deal with my type of complaints.

Mr Taylor resigned once the Lockerbie Bomber appealed to allow SCCRC to remain independent and Impartial, This being the case why did Taylor not resign in 2001 when my case against him was accepted for review.

SCCRC allowed Mr Taylor to remain on the Commission despite me making serious allegations about the way he handled my trial, In particular his Incompetence and Negligence.

Where was the Independence and Impartiality that i was entitled to the same as Megrahi.

Be sure to look out for next paper chasing tactics and further complaints against SCCRC Here.