Despite repeated attempts to obtain Crown Witnesses Precognitions from Crown Office over the years to Cross Check them with the ones i already have in my possession Crown Office are still telling my MSP that they are covered by Data Protection as they identify living People.
What a Joke.
The following is intended purely just to show the public that this Data Protection is a Joke.
For a start anyone chaged in Scotland is provided with a list of witnesses names and address’s so you would think this would do away with data protection right away.
To add insult to injury though, I already have “Crown Witneses Precognitions” as Crown put it but further insult comes from the fact that once a witness gives evidence in court then their “Data” becomes public Knowledge. Thus not covered by Data Protection.
We only need look at recent Appeals on the High Court Website to find cases were peoples details are published daily with evidence also of what witnesses said what and how.
Further insult in my case comes from the fact that not only do i have Crown Precognitions i also have the “Minutes” of my trial Provided by SCCRC, Which among other things contains the Jurors Names and Address’s.
All documents mentioned above can be viewed bellow:
I will continue to post copies of all Crown Precognitions including the two Postmen who where Robbed in Livingston on 12 Dec 1981 at Carmondean Shopping Centre (Safeway Superstore) until i have published all witness’s names and address’s, Then i will ask my MSP to do another FOI request asking for them again now that their names and Address’s are revealed to the public.
Watch out also not only for their names and Address’s from 1981 but also for their current address’s found via the voters roll, Like Nigel Muckle Policeman no longer from Livingston but now residing in Mid Calder.
Full names and address’s will be revealed.
Charge sheet and list of Crown Witness’s are listed in the following two documents:
Despite this Crown have continually refused to hand over basically what i already have.
Their letter of refusal from 2005 can now be viewed below with their pathetic excuse for non disclosure
Note this letter is signed by head of High Court Unit.
Watch out next for postmen’s Crown Precognitions with their address’s and other people’s Data handed to me by SCCRC.
SCCRC Incompetence and Data Protection sham.
SCCRC lost important documents which i have kept regarding my case, including letters i sent to George Younger the then Secretary of State for Scotland (Now Dead) and Justice at Chancery Lane London.
For proof of their incompetence and negligence they handed me other peoples documents and in particular as mentioned above Jurors names and address’s but below clearly they handed me documents concerning an appeal to them by John King against his sentence. See below for proof:
See Postmen’s Address’s that were robbed in my case Below:
Postman William John Young Horn, 86 Stewartfield Crescent, Broxburn, West Lothian.
Postman John Ramsay Smart Henderson, 32 Charles Crescent, Bathgate, West Lothian.
Quite clearly these statements are either Police or Crown Witness statements, They certainly bear the Crown Stamp.
Despite these being released to me Crown Office are and have for many years told me they cannot release these to me as they contain Data which identifies living people.
The above two postmen are listed as ages 44 and 46 in 1982 which would make them 70 and 72, Crown should state if they have evidence these witness’s are still living since they have sought to use data protection as a ban on releasing these documents.
The fact that i have these documents and crown refuse to release them speaks volumes.
My MSP has done a FOI request asking for these documents and been told they were released at the time of trial.
This certainly adds credence to my complaint that my defence team had them at the time of my trial which they have sought to convince SCCRC they never saw.
Mr Taylor QC says if he had seen the crown witness’s statements he would seriously have considered calling David Livingston, The fact he never called this crucial crown witness means he defectively represented me.
SCCRC never asked Crown office if they were released to my defence team but since crown have now confirmed they were, speaks volumes about the SCCRCs reluctance to investigate their own as they should have asked when they were released.
Posted by bigwulliebeck 
